HDL-C: Not an Accurate Predictor of Heart Disease?
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) should not be the only lipid considered when determining cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, according to a new study.
Although HDL-C levels have been used independently to predict CVD risk for many years, it is unclear how the levels of other lipids, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides, factor into the relationship.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Simply Raising HDL Levels May Not Prevent CV Disease
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To conduct their study, the researchers followed 3590 participants without known CVD in the Framingham Heart Study offspring cohort from 1987 to 2011.
Low HDL-C was categorized as less than 40 mg/dL in men and less than 50 mg/dL in women and was considered isolated if triglycerides and LDL-C levels were also low, at less than 100 mg/dL.
The researchers also examined higher thresholds for triglycerides (150 mg/dL or more) and LDL-C (130 mg/dL or more) and compared low and high levels of HDL-C to further understand its link to CVD risk.
The results showed that a higher CVD risk was present when low HDL-C was accompanied by:
- LDL-C levels of 100 mg/dL or higher and triglyceride levels of less than 100 mg/dL,
- Triglyceride levels of 100 mg/dL or more and LDL-C levels of less than 100 mg/dL, or
- Triglyceride and LDL-C levels of 100 mg/dL or more.
“CVD risk as a function of HDL-C phenotypes is modulated by other components of the lipid panel,” the researchers concluded.
—Amanda Balbi
Reference:
Bartlett J, Predazzi IM, Williams SM, et al. Is isolated low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol a cardiovascular disease risk factor?: new insights from the Framingham Offspring Study [published online May 10, 2016]. Circulation. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002436.